Mach Learn manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Abstract We present a new application and covering number bound for the framework of "Machine Learning with Operational Costs (MLOC)," which is an exploratory form of decision theory. The MLOC framework incorporates knowledge about how a predictive model will be used for a subsequent task, thus combining machine learning with the decision that is made afterwards. In this work, we use the MLOC framework to study a problem that has implications for power grid reliability and maintenance, called the Machine Learning and Traveling Repairman Problem (ML&TRP). The goal of the ML&TRP is to determine a route for a "repair crew," which repairs nodes on a graph. The repair crew aims to minimize the cost of failures at the nodes, but as in many real situations, the failure probabilities are not known and must be estimated. The MLOC framework allows us to understand how this uncertainty influences the repair route. Keywords decision theory · generalization bound · constrained linear function classes · covering numbers · traveling repairman · mixed-integer programming 1 Introduction In many domains, it is essential to understand how uncertainty in predictions influences decision-making. Funding for Theja Tulabandhula was provided by a Fulbright Fellowship and Xerox Fellowship. Cynthia Rudin's work on this project was funded in part by Con Edison, by the MIT Energy Initiative Seed Fund, and NSF grant IIS-1053407. The new framework of Machine Learning with Operational Costs (MLOC) (Tulabandhula and Rudin, 2013) provides a mechanism to do this, and is a type of exploratory decision theory. Where usual decision theories provide a single policy that minimizes expected costs, the MLOC framework is able to produce a range of reasonable policies that span the full set of reasonable costs. To do this, the operational cost becomes a regularization term within the machine learning model, and adjusting the regularization constant allows us to explore solutions for all reasonable costs. This gives decision makers a way to understand the uncertainty in their predictive model in terms of something they can grasp - uncertainty in the cost to solve the problem. The MLOC framework can also be used in another way, namely to incorporate prior knowledge about the cost to produce a better predictive model.

This work proposes a way to align statistical modeling with decision making. We provide a method that propagates the uncertainty in predictive modeling to the uncertainty in operational cost, where operational cost is the amount spent by the practitioner in solving the problem. The method allows us to explore the range of operational costs associated with the set of reasonable statistical models, so as to provide a useful way for practitioners to understand uncertainty. To do this, the operational cost is cast as a regularization term in a learning algorithm's objective function, allowing either an optimistic or pessimistic view of possible costs, depending on the regularization parameter. From another perspective, if we have prior knowledge about the operational cost, for instance that it should be low, this knowledge can help to restrict the hypothesis space, and can help with generalization. We provide a theoretical generalization bound for this scenario. We also show that learning with operational costs is related to robust optimization.